Nyhan, Bambrick, Kinzie & Lowry has built a reputation as one of the most respected workers’ compensation defense law firms in the Midwest. We started as a workers’ compensation defense firm, and it continues to be our foundation.
Whenever one of your employees suffers a work-related illness or injury, you need skilled, experienced, and aggressive counsel to help you defend your interests. For more than three decades, we have represented employers throughout the Midwest seeking counsel on all types of workers’ compensation cases and matters related to those claims.
We use our experience and resources to quickly and thoroughly evaluate your case and develop the most practical and effective defense strategy. Throughout the process, we regularly communicate with you about the progress of your case and work toward a fast resolution. Whether through settlement, litigation, or appeal, we defend your interests and work relentlessly toward the results you want.
We also provide you with prompt, outstanding service during all phases of litigation, from initial strategic planning to final resolution. You can count on us to make complicated laws easier to understand and options easier to weigh. Our team has broad experience, which helps you make the best possible decisions.
As policy advocates, we will consult with you on the best practices related to accident reporting, investigations, and claim handling procedures. Our goal is to help you manage your risk and mitigate costs. If we represent you, we will be your partner and fight for you and your interests on every workers’ compensation claim.
Petitioner vs. Diversified Hospitality Company
After the parties proceeded to trial, the arbitrator found the petitioner failed to prove that his injuries caused by a slip and fall that took place in his employer’s parking lot arose out of his employment. Instead, the arbitrator found the injury arose from personal risk.
Petitioner vs. Temporary Staffing Agency
The petitioner alleged a back injury which occurred in the week leading up to his termination. Due to our investigation, our attorneys obtained a voice message from petitioner that makes no reference to an alleged accident, but rather frustration due to being terminated. The arbitrator found the respondent’s witnesses and evidence to be more convincing than the petitioner’s testimony and denied benefits.
Petitioner vs. Burial Vault Manufacturer
This was a contested case involving the issue of whether the petitioner suffered an accident at work. The arbitrator found the petitioner lacked credibility, especially given his failure to mention his alleged work accident to three separate medical providers after the alleged date of accident, and denied compensation.
"The foundation of our longstanding partnership with the firm is based on our shared values of honesty and fairness. They recognize our unique needs and work with us to achieve a desired outcome in a cost efficient and practical manner."
